According to critics, what is the best type of image manipulation?

The assessment of image manipulation often hinges on transparency and realism in the final output. Manipulations that are not visible to the viewer typically aim to enhance the photograph without altering its perceived authenticity. This approach maintains the essence of the original image while subtly improving aspects such as exposure, color balance, or sharpness, allowing the audience to experience the photo as a true representation of the scene.

Invisible adjustments are preferred by critics because they retain the integrity of the image, allowing for a polished look that does not compromise the viewer's trust in the photograph's authenticity. Techniques like retouching blemishes or correcting minor flaws fall under this category, as they can elevate the quality of the work without drawing attention to the fact that manipulation has occurred. Critics argue that this type of enhancement reflects the skill and artistry of the photographer, as it indicates a careful balance between enhancement and authenticity.

In contrast, visible adjustments, combining multiple images, and openly applied digital effects may draw attention to the manipulation itself, potentially distracting from the photograph's content or its emotional response. They often challenge the notion of realism, leading to debates about what constitutes a genuine representation of the moment captured. Thus, manipulating images in a way that is not immediately detectable aligns with the principles of subtlety,